Aino Alasentie divides her time between the Finnish Research Impact Foundation (FRIF) and STEK. The shared specialist role brings financial expertise to two small organizations while creating opportunities to share effective practices and strengthen long-term planning.

Alasentie spent more than ten years working in a small non-profit organization in the field of environmental education. Her educational background includes genetics, teaching and environmental education. Financial matters were part of everyday organizational work, and over time she became increasingly interested in how organizations plan and manage their finances.
“I realized I enjoyed Excel much more than Word or PowerPoint,” she says with a laugh.
Eventually, that interest led her to a completely new career. Alasentie retrained in financial administration and spent around seven years working at an accounting firm. In recent years, she specialized in the financial administration of associations and foundations.
Now the two strands of her career have come together. In August, Alasentie joined the Finnish Research Impact Foundation (FRIF) as Finance, Administration and Fundraising Officer. She divides her time equally between FRIF and STEK.
Two organizations, many of the same questions
Alasentie’s responsibilities are partly similar in the two organizations. Her work includes financial planning and monitoring as well as tasks related to grants and payments. At STEK, she is also responsible for bookkeeping, while at FRIF her role includes more administrative work.
For Alasentie, however, the most interesting part of the shared role is not how her working hours are divided. It is what can emerge from working between two organizations.
She has already noticed that many of the same questions related to finance and administration come up in both places. When one organization finds a useful solution or raises a new perspective, she can bring the same question to the other.
“If an important issue comes up in one organization, I can immediately take it to the other and ask: have you thought about this here?”
Sometimes the benefit is very concrete.
“If I build an Excel tool for monitoring cash flow, I can essentially replicate it straight away for the other organization.”
For Alasentie, this is where the potential of a shared specialist role becomes particularly clear. The same things do not need to be invented twice, and neither organization has to work in isolation.
Small organizations can benefit from shared financial expertise
Alasentie believes the model could have wider potential as well. Small associations and foundations may not need, or be able, to employ a full-time finance manager. Yet many would benefit from having someone regularly look beyond day-to-day finances and take a longer-term view.
This is something Alasentie had already considered in her previous roles. Executive directors are often experts in their organization’s core field, but long-term financial planning may not be part of their own expertise.
“In small associations, there may simply be no one who has the time, skills or interest to do this. Yet it could have a major impact on the kinds of decisions the organization is able to make about its future.”
Long-term planning is also one of the aspects of her current work that Alasentie finds most interesting. Cash flow forecasts and different scenarios can help build a picture of what an organization’s finances might look like a few years from now and what different decisions could mean in practice.
“It is specifically about producing data to support decision-making.”
Financial and administrative expertise could be shared more widely
Working between two organizations has also made Alasentie think more broadly about how much foundations and associations could learn from one another.
There are already many networks for exchanging experiences related to organizations’ core activities. In her view, there could be more similar dialogue around finance and administration.
“I’m certain everyone would have something to learn from each other. How have you solved this problem? The financial constraints are quite similar for many organizations.”
Alasentie’s own role is still taking shape. She does not think success can be measured simply by whether her working hours are divided exactly in half. A more important question is whether both organizations receive the support they need and whether the shared role creates benefits that would not otherwise emerge.
In the coming months, Alasentie hopes above all that the different pieces of the role will settle into place.
“I want to know that I’m doing the right things at the right time, in the right place, for the right organizations.”




